- Approximate cost of services:
- $9,000.00
This review is fake.
Future Paving did not do this job. No complaint was ever received from “john” . We met with Homestars to resolve this but they would not provide any proof of the job or an even an email address to contact “john”.
Mr. Koll,
We apologize for the water pool issue. We will be contacting you shortly to arrange a repair for as soon as possible.
Thank you for your great review of Future Paving. We strive to continually keep our customers happy.
Future paving honours all it's contracts and takes all measures to complete jobs on time and in a clean and professional manner. We have been in business for over 20 years and rarely do we come across a client such as Mrs Marzewski and when we do every effort is made to ensure the job runs smoothly and both sides are happy.
The contract for this job is available to anyone as a reference, (minus personal information not already revealed by them). Feel free to visit our website futurepaving.org and contact us.
The total amount for this job to remove the old driveway and replace it with asphalt and interlock edging was 11,500.00.
Future paving asked for and received a 500.00 deposit.
Future Paving arrived at the Marzewski residence with three dump trucks 7 employees and, hundreds of thousand of dollars in heavy equipment. Future Paving spent more than half a day excavating the old driveway and removing 2.5 dump trucks of rubble. We escavated and removed the old asphalt driveway, the old concrete walkway, wooden siding of the old driveway and grass extension. We supplied and installed 2.5 dump trucks of gravel.
Mrs Marzewski told Tom our sales person she wanted to enlarge the driveway escavate further than its existing size. I strongly advised her against it and explained that the City does check and will demand you replace the driveway to the original size. Against our advice she went ahead enlarging the driveway only to have the inspector demand she reduce it to original size. This is part of the City public record.
Prior to the installment of the interlocking, we asked for a progressive payment schedule to be met. To this point we had only received the 500.00 down payment. She did pay 3,500.00 bringing the total to 4,000.00. The deposit for interlock stones and materials was denied and she demanded more work and materials for the same price. Unfortunately without the agreed upon progressive payment schedule being met, future paving could not continue. After a failed negotiation, we realized the customer was unrealistic, unethical and impossible to please, so we removed our materials.
She demanded more than the agreed contract and expected extra work and material for free. We were very patient and tried several times to work with Mrs. Marzewski but she was impossible. The 4000.00 we received did not even cover the cost of work done and materials received. There is still a 2000.00 balance owing. No money was ever paid for interlock as Mrs. Marzewski suggests. Since both parties were unable to come to an agreement, future paving removed the material which she refused to pay for.
Legal action for defamation has been taken against Mrs. Marzewski at 58 Park Home. She will be required to cease and desist this slanderous review.