Parliament Contracting

We had a leak before Parliament installed a new roof for us. Four years later, the leak resumed and a second leak appeared. One of the owners visited and, because of the snow on the roof, was unable to diagnose the problem. He did not go up into our attic. He mentioned several possible causes, including a poorly installed window. He said he would return in the spring if the leak continued. In the spring I called and was told quite firmly by the other owner that the problem was the window--the problem was not the roof. No one would come to look at the problem. No one would go up into our attic. We replaced the window, but the second leak continued (this was the leak that appeared after Parliament replaced the roof). This time, the owners told us that the problem was our siding. We spent tens of thousands of dollars replacing the siding, but the second leak continued. When I complained to the siding company, they sent someone up into our attic to diagnose the problem (something that Parliament had not done, despite our repeated complaints about the leaks). It turned out that the problem was a mushroom vent that Parliament had installed. It was too short and snow was getting into our attic. We paid the siding people several thousand dollars to replace the vent and repair the ceiling (now covered in mould). I reported this outcome in an email to Parliament but received no response.